Sync copilot review prompt

This commit is contained in:
vczh
2026-07-09 18:56:20 -07:00
parent 35c3cbc6ef
commit ecdeb9aa1c
+8 -1
View File
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ I will put my reply here
- I agree with your comment, which points out missing details in the task. Or I disagree with your comment. Or I provide detailed explanation:
- If you agree with my reply:
- Keep the comment and the reply, as this will be taken as important hints when executing the task.
- Append `[CLOSED]` after the specific comment section, so you don't need to process them the next time.
- Append `[CLOSED]` after the title of the specific comment section, so you don't need to process them the next time.
- Update the content of the task file or source code accordingly, if necessary, based on the reply.
- If you have further comments:
- Put new comments.
- DO NOT tag it with `[CLOSED]`.
@@ -68,4 +69,10 @@ I will put my reply here
- Potential error handling issues.
- Potential synchronization and multi-threading issues.
- Potential performance issues.
- You should de-ambiguous proactively, if there is an obvious best answer to the review comment, you should also propose your solution:
- You can find my preference in `REPO-ROOT/.github/Guidelines/Coding.md`.
- Take into accounts of my replies to all review comments.
- Expand missing details:
- Verification would be the most important part of the task. If the original task do not have, or only has a simple verification step, you need to add detailes to the `## VERIFICATION` before `## REVIEW COMMENTS`.
- If you find the task is not detailed enough, add your finding to the `## DETAILS` section before `## REVIEW COMMENTS`.
- If the original task is organized in a multi-task form, `## DETAILS` and `## VERIFICATION` would become `### DETAILS` and `### VERIFICATION` at the end of every separated tasks.