2004-10-15 Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>

PR 692/rtems
	* rtems/src/regiongetsegment.c, rtems/src/regionreturnsegment.c: The
	Region Manager did not follow the proper protocol when blocking and
	unblocking tasks waiting on buffers. This was a bug introduced with
	the transition to an Allocation Mutex.

cpukit/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2004-10-15	Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>
+
+	PR 692/rtems
+	* rtems/src/regiongetsegment.c, rtems/src/regionreturnsegment.c: The
+	Region Manager did not follow the proper protocol when blocking and
+	unblocking tasks waiting on buffers. This was a bug introduced with
+	the transition to an Allocation Mutex.
+
 2004-09-29	Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com>
 
 	* configure.ac, libmisc/cpuuse/README, libmisc/stackchk/README,

cpukit/rtems/src/regiongetsegment.c

@@ -98,6 +98,14 @@ rtems_status_code rtems_region_get_segment(
         return RTEMS_UNSATISFIED;
       }
 
+      /*
+       *  Switch from using the memory allocation mutex to using a
+       *  dispatching disabled critical section.  We have to do this
+       *  because this thread is going to block.
+       */
+      _Thread_Disable_dispatch();
+      _RTEMS_Unlock_allocator();
+
       executing->Wait.queue           = &the_region->Wait_queue;
       executing->Wait.id              = id;
       executing->Wait.count           = size;
@@ -107,7 +115,8 @@ rtems_status_code rtems_region_get_segment(
 
       _Thread_queue_Enqueue( &the_region->Wait_queue, timeout );
 
-      _RTEMS_Unlock_allocator();
+      _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
+
       return (rtems_status_code) executing->Wait.return_code;
   }
 

cpukit/rtems/src/regionreturnsegment.c

@@ -94,6 +94,19 @@ rtems_status_code rtems_region_return_segment(
       }
 
       the_region->number_of_used_blocks -= 1;
+
+      /*
+       *  Switch from using the memory allocation mutex to using a
+       *  dispatching disabled critical section.  We have to do this
+       *  because this thread may unblock one or more threads that were
+       *  waiting on memory.
+       *
+       *  NOTE: The following loop is O(n) where n is the number of
+       *        threads whose memory request is satisfied.
+       */
+      _RTEMS_Unlock_allocator();
+      _Thread_Disable_dispatch();
+
       for ( ; ; ) {
         the_thread = _Thread_queue_First( &the_region->Wait_queue );
 
@@ -113,8 +126,8 @@ rtems_status_code rtems_region_return_segment(
         _Thread_queue_Extract( &the_region->Wait_queue, the_thread );
         the_thread->Wait.return_code = RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
       }
+      _Thread_Enable_dispatch();
 
-      _RTEMS_Unlock_allocator();
       return RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
   }