binfmt_execmodule() calls to sched_releasttcb() was not updated to use the second, thread type parameter

git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@5779 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
This commit is contained in:
patacongo
2013-03-23 19:06:40 +00:00
parent 983a9dca49
commit b2ef4a0f24
5 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
+1 -2
View File
@@ -191,8 +191,7 @@ CONFIG_LPC17_GPDMA=y
#
# SDIO Configuration
#
# CONFIG_SDIO_DMA=y
CONFIG_SDIO_DMAPRIO=0x0
# CONFIG_SDIO_DMA is not defined
# CONFIG_SDIO_WIDTH_D1_ONLY is not set
#
+1 -2
View File
@@ -185,8 +185,7 @@ CONFIG_LPC17_GPDMA=y
#
# SDIO Configuration
#
# CONFIG_SDIO_DMA=y
CONFIG_SDIO_DMAPRIO=0x0
# CONFIG_SDIO_DMA is not defined
# CONFIG_SDIO_WIDTH_D1_ONLY is not set
#
+2 -1
View File
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@
*
* For the same reasons, the maximum size of the SRAM mapping is limited to
* 4KB. Both of these alignment limitations could be reduced by using
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range.
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range or perhaps with some
* clever use of subregions.
*
* A detailed memory map for the 64KB CPU SRAM region is as follows:
*
+2 -1
View File
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@
*
* For the same reasons, the maximum size of the SRAM mapping is limited to
* 4KB. Both of these alignment limitations could be reduced by using
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range.
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range or perhaps with some
* clever use of subregions.
*
* A detailed memory map for the 16Kb SRAM region is as follows:
*
+2 -1
View File
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@
*
* For the same reasons, the maximum size of the SRAM mapping is limited to
* 4KB. Both of these alignment limitations could be reduced by using
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range.
* multiple regions to map the FLASH/SDRAM range or perhaps with some
* clever use of subregions.
*
* A detailed memory map for the 112KB SRAM region is as follows:
*