mirror of
https://github.com/apache/nuttx.git
synced 2026-06-06 00:14:22 +08:00
All STM32 host drivers. In IN endpoint retry, delay for a clock tick to give some breathing space for the CPU. EXPERIMENTAL change.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1906,6 +1906,14 @@ static ssize_t stm32_in_transfer(FAR struct stm32_usbhost_s *priv, int chidx,
|
||||
|
||||
return (ssize_t)ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait a bit before retrying after a NAK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* REVISIT: This is intended to give the CPU a break from
|
||||
* the tight polling loop. But are there performance issues?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
usleep(1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1911,6 +1911,14 @@ static ssize_t stm32_in_transfer(FAR struct stm32_usbhost_s *priv, int chidx,
|
||||
|
||||
return (ssize_t)ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait a bit before retrying after a NAK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* REVISIT: This is intended to give the CPU a break from
|
||||
* the tight polling loop. But are there performance issues?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
usleep(1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1905,6 +1905,14 @@ static ssize_t stm32_in_transfer(FAR struct stm32_usbhost_s *priv, int chidx,
|
||||
|
||||
return (ssize_t)ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait a bit before retrying after a NAK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* REVISIT: This is intended to give the CPU a break from
|
||||
* the tight polling loop. But are there performance issues?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
usleep(1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1910,6 +1910,14 @@ static ssize_t stm32l4_in_transfer(FAR struct stm32l4_usbhost_s *priv,
|
||||
|
||||
return (ssize_t)ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wait a bit before retrying after a NAK.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* REVISIT: This is intended to give the CPU a break from
|
||||
* the tight polling loop. But are there performance issues?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
usleep(1000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user