utest: update naems using new rule

The names of the utest cases defined in their respective
modules have been updated.

Some utest case names are not yet in their respective modules
because their paths need to be finalized before their unique
names can be determined. Currently, these names do not
appear to conflict with the unified names. These include:

- utest cases still in examples
- bsp/qemu-virt64-riscv/applications/test/test_vector/test_vector.c.
  The entire test case should probably be placed in libcpu/risc-v
  rather than bsp.

Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_adc.c

@@ -115,4 +115,4 @@ static void testcase(void)
 {
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(test_read);
 }
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "adc", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.adc", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_gpio.c

@@ -102,4 +102,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "gpio", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.gpio", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_gpio_irq.c

@@ -130,4 +130,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "gpio_irq", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.gpio_irq", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_pdma.c

@@ -296,4 +296,4 @@ void test_pdma()
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(test_pdma_rx);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(test_pdma, "pdma", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(test_pdma, "bsp.k230.drivers.pdma", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_pwm.c

@@ -117,4 +117,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(pwm_testcase, "pwm", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(pwm_testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.pwm", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_timer.c

@@ -150,4 +150,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(hw_timer_testcase, "timer", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(hw_timer_testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.timer", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_ts.c

@@ -130,4 +130,4 @@ static void testcase(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(test_ts_read);
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(test_ts_control);
 }
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "ts", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.ts", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 100);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_uart.c

@@ -162,4 +162,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(uart_testcase, "uart", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(uart_testcase, "bsp.k230.drivers.uart", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);

bsp/k230/drivers/utest/test_wdt.c

@@ -143,4 +143,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_init(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(test_wdt, "wdt", utest_init, NULL, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(test_wdt, "bsp.k230.drivers.wdt", utest_init, NULL, 10);

components/drivers/audio/utest/tc_audio_main.c

@@ -306,4 +306,4 @@ static rt_err_t utest_tc_cleanup(void)
     return RT_EOK;
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "audio.tc_audio_main", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(testcase, "components.drivers.audio.tc_audio_main", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 10);

components/utilities/utest/utest/TC_uassert.c

@@ -86,4 +86,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_uassert_in_range);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "utest", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 10);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "components.utilities.utest.uassert", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 10);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_memcmp.c

@@ -158,4 +158,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_rt_memcmp_large_array);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_memcmp", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_memcmp", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_memcpy.c

@@ -105,4 +105,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_rt_memcpy_align);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_memcpy", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_memcpy", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 1000);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_memmove.c

@@ -105,4 +105,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_rt_memmove_empty_string);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_memmove", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_memmove", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_memset.c

@@ -99,4 +99,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_rt_memcpy_input);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_memset", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_memset", utest_tc_init, utest_tc_cleanup, 1000);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_sprintf.c

@@ -1062,4 +1062,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(SPRINTF_TEST_CASE_NAME(misc));
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_sprintf", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_sprintf", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);

src/klibc/utest/TC_rt_sscanf.c

@@ -247,4 +247,4 @@ static void utest_do_tc(void)
     UTEST_UNIT_RUN(TC_rt_sscanf_issue_9853);
 }
 
-UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "klibc.rt_sscanf", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);
+UTEST_TC_EXPORT(utest_do_tc, "core.klibc.rt_sscanf", RT_NULL, RT_NULL, 1000);