Mirrors_Framework/nuttx
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/apache/nuttx.git synced 2026-06-04 06:42:32 +08:00
Code Issues Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Verify C++ support with CodeSourcery

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@4016 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
This commit is contained in:
patacongo
2011-10-03 21:10:11 +00:00
parent 28b4cb23b1
commit f070246d83
3 changed files with 40 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
libxx/libxx_new.cxx
+11 -3
View File
@@ -58,14 +58,22 @@
// Name: new
//
// NOTE:
// This should take a type of size_t, which for ARM GCC is unsigned long.
// but size_t may actually be a different different type, in sys/include.h,
// it is typed as uint32_t. Need to REVISIT this.
// This should take a type of size_t. But size_t has an unknown underlying
// type. In the nuttx sys/types.h header file, size_t is typed as uint32_t
// (which is determined by architecture-specific logic). But the C++
// compiler may believe that size_t is of a different type resulting in
// compilation errors in the operator. Using the underlying integer type
// instead of size_t seems to resolve the compilation issues. Need to
// REVISIT this.
//
//***************************************************************************
//void *operator new(size_t nbytes)
#ifdef CONFIG_CXX_NEWLONG
void *operator new(unsigned long nbytes)
#else
void *operator new(unsigned int nbytes)
#endif
{
// We have to allocate something
libxx/libxx_newa.cxx
+12 -4
View File
@@ -58,18 +58,26 @@
// Name: new
//
// NOTE:
// This should take a type of size_t, which for ARM GCC is unsigned long.
// but size_t may actually be a different different type, in sys/include.h,
// it is typed as uint32_t. Need to REVISIT this.
// This should take a type of size_t. But size_t has an unknown underlying
// type. In the nuttx sys/types.h header file, size_t is typed as uint32_t
// (which is determined by architecture-specific logic). But the C++
// compiler may believe that size_t is of a different type resulting in
// compilation errors in the operator. Using the underlying integer type
// instead of size_t seems to resolve the compilation issues. Need to
// REVISIT this.
//
//***************************************************************************
//void *operator new[](size_t size)
#ifdef CONFIG_CXX_NEWLONG
void *operator new[](unsigned long nbytes)
#else
void *operator new[](unsigned int nbytes)
#endif
{
// We have to allocate something
if (nbytes< 1)
if (nbytes < 1)
{
nbytes = 1;
}