mirror of
https://github.com/apache/nuttx.git
synced 2026-06-06 08:36:24 +08:00
Add framework for managing SPI-related discretes on the Freedom KL25Z board.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
NuttX TODO List (Last updated May 29, 2013)
|
||||
NuttX TODO List (Last updated June 20, 2013)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
This file summarizes known NuttX bugs, limitations, inconsistencies with
|
||||
@@ -903,10 +903,22 @@ o Libraries (libc/)
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
Priority: Low
|
||||
|
||||
Title: FERROR() AND CLEARERR()
|
||||
Description: Not implemented: ferror() and clearerr()
|
||||
Title: FERROR()
|
||||
Description: ferror(), feof(), and clearerror() are present, but the
|
||||
implementation of ferror() is limited. There are flags in the
|
||||
stream structure to indicate EOF and error conditions but nothing
|
||||
in the code currently sets the error indication. This is a
|
||||
trivial change to many interfaces and has not yet been done.
|
||||
Instead, for now, ferror() is equivalent to !feof(). If an
|
||||
interface can failure because of an error or and EOF and you
|
||||
only want to distinguish between an error and the EOF then
|
||||
this ferror() will work. However, if no error is reported then
|
||||
this ferror() cannot tell you if an error has occurred or not.
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
Priority: Low
|
||||
Priority: Meidum to Low: Some applications use ferror() and not the
|
||||
return value to determine if an error occurred. Those
|
||||
applications will fail with this limited implementation of
|
||||
ferror().
|
||||
|
||||
Title: CONCURRENT STREAM READ/WRITE
|
||||
Description: NuttX only supports a single file pointer so reads and writes
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user