From 791bba205f16eabf6516984af75d4ba70bb4bc8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: patacongo <patacongo@42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:54:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add FAT test issue

git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/nuttx/code/trunk@1052 42af7a65-404d-4744-a932-0658087f49c3
---
 TODO | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 6c36e39596f..5f69108c946 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ o File system / Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
   Status:      Open
   Priority:    Low
 
-  Description: FAT32: long file names
+  Description: FAT: long file names
   Status:      Open
   Priority:    Medium
 
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ o File system / Generic drivers (fs/, drivers/)
   Priority:    Low.  I have mixed feelings about if NuttX should pay a
                performance penalty for better data integrity.
 
+  Description: FAT: FAT32 is untested -- because I don't have any large
+               enough devices yet to support a FAT32 FS.
+  Status:      Open
+  Priority:    Medium
+
 o Pascal Add-On (pcode/)
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^