Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/patch'

This commit is contained in:
ghidra1
2023-01-19 08:21:32 -05:00
15 changed files with 828 additions and 117 deletions
@@ -559,12 +559,16 @@ public class FillOutStructureCmd extends BackgroundCommand {
return currentProgram.getDataTypeManager().getUniqueName(new CategoryPath(category), base);
}
private boolean sanityCheck(long offset) {
private boolean sanityCheck(long offset, long existingSize) {
if (offset < 0) {
return false; // offsets shouldn't be negative
}
if (offset < existingSize) {
return true; // we have room in the structure
}
if (offset > 0x1000) {
return false; // Arbitrary size cut-off to prevent creating huge structures
return false; // bigger than existing size; arbitrary cut-off to prevent huge structures
}
return true;
}
@@ -648,7 +652,7 @@ public class FillOutStructureCmd extends BackgroundCommand {
long value = getSigned(inputs[1]);
newOff = currentRef.offset +
((pcodeOp.getOpcode() == PcodeOp.INT_ADD) ? value : (-value));
if (sanityCheck(newOff)) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
if (sanityCheck(newOff, componentMap.getSize())) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
putOnList(output, newOff, todoList, doneList);
// Don't do componentMap.addDataType() as data-type info here is likely uninformed
componentMap.setMinimumSize(newOff);
@@ -659,7 +663,7 @@ public class FillOutStructureCmd extends BackgroundCommand {
break;
}
newOff = currentRef.offset + getSigned(inputs[1]) * inputs[2].getOffset();
if (sanityCheck(newOff)) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
if (sanityCheck(newOff, componentMap.getSize())) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
putOnList(output, newOff, todoList, doneList);
// Don't do componentMap.addReference() as data-type info here is likely uninformed
componentMap.setMinimumSize(newOff);
@@ -670,7 +674,7 @@ public class FillOutStructureCmd extends BackgroundCommand {
break;
}
long subOff = currentRef.offset + getSigned(inputs[1]);
if (sanityCheck(subOff)) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
if (sanityCheck(subOff, componentMap.getSize())) { // should this offset create a location in the structure?
putOnList(output, subOff, todoList, doneList);
// Don't do componentMap.addReference() as data-type info here is likely uninformed
componentMap.setMinimumSize(subOff);
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
/* ###
* IP: GHIDRA
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
package ghidra.app.plugin.core.decompile;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import ghidra.app.decompiler.DecompInterface;
import ghidra.app.decompiler.DecompileOptions;
import ghidra.app.decompiler.DecompileResults;
import ghidra.app.plugin.processors.sleigh.SleighLanguageVolatilityTest;
import ghidra.program.model.address.Address;
import ghidra.program.model.address.AddressFormatException;
import ghidra.program.model.listing.Function;
import ghidra.program.model.listing.Program;
import ghidra.program.database.ProgramBuilder;
import ghidra.util.task.TaskMonitor;
public class DecompilerPspecVolatilityTest extends SleighLanguageVolatilityTest {
private Program prog;
private DecompInterface decompiler;
private String functionBytes = "84 ff 02 c0 8d 9a 01 c0 8d 98 85 ff 02 c0 a4 9a 01 c0 a4 98 2f "
+ "b7 86 ff 05 c0 f8 94 90 91 02 01 90 68 04 c0 f8 94 90 91 02 01 9f 77 90 93 02 01"
+ " 2f bf 87 ff 02 c0 a3 9a 01 c0 a3 98 8f 9a 85 e0 8a 95 f1 f7 00 00 8f 98 08";
private int functionLength = 27;
private String addressString = "0x1000";
private String decompilation;
private String decompilerPORTFNotVolatileString = "DAT_mem_0031 = DAT_mem_0031";
private String decompilerPORTGNotVolatileString = "DAT_mem_0034 = DAT_mem_0034";
private boolean decompilerPORTFVolatile;
private boolean decompilerPORTGVolatile;
public void setUp(Boolean symbolVolatile, Integer symbolSize, Boolean memoryVolatile, boolean reverse) throws Exception {
super.setUp(symbolVolatile, symbolSize, memoryVolatile, reverse);
ProgramBuilder builder = new ProgramBuilder("test", lang);
builder.setBytes(addressString, functionBytes);
builder.disassemble(addressString, functionLength, false);
builder.createFunction(addressString);
prog = builder.getProgram();
if (decompiler != null) {
decompiler.dispose();
}
decompiler = new DecompInterface();
decompiler.openProgram(prog);
decompilation = getDecompilationString(addressString);
decompilerPORTFVolatile = !decompilation.contains(decompilerPORTFNotVolatileString);
decompilerPORTGVolatile = !decompilation.contains(decompilerPORTGNotVolatileString);
}
private String getDecompilationString(String address) throws AddressFormatException
{
Address addr = prog.getAddressFactory().getDefaultAddressSpace().getAddress(address);
Function func = prog.getListing().getFunctionAt(addr);
DecompileResults decompResults = decompiler.decompileFunction(func,
DecompileOptions.SUGGESTED_DECOMPILE_TIMEOUT_SECS, TaskMonitor.DUMMY);
String decompilation = decompResults.getDecompiledFunction().getC();
return decompilation;
}
@After
public void tearDown() throws Exception {
if (decompiler != null) {
decompiler.dispose();
}
}
@Test
public void testDecompileInterfaceReturnsAFunction() throws Exception {
setUp(null, null, false, false);
Assert.assertNotNull(decompilation);
}
@Test
public void testDecompilePORTFSymbolPspecSettings() throws Exception {
setUp(null, null, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(false, null, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(true, null, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is volatile because the symbol element in the language
//pspec file defined the symbol at mem:0x31 to be volatile.
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
}
@Test
public void testDecompilePORTFMemoryPspecSettings() throws Exception {
setUp(null, null, true, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is volatile because the pspec file includes a volatile
//element that defines the memory location that includes 0x31 as volatile.
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(null, null, false, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(null, null, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(false, null, true, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile because the pspec file defines the
//symbol element PORTF as not volatile and that takes precedence over the pspec's volatile
//element.
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(true, null, true, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is volatile
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
setUp(false, null, true, true);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 is not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
}
@Test
public void testDecompilePORFSizeOverwritesPORTG() throws Exception {
setUp(true, 1, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 and mem:0x34 are volatile
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTGVolatile);
setUp(false, 4, true, false); //size of 4 addressable units 0x31, 0x32, 0x33 0x34
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 and mem:0x34 are not volatile
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
Assert.assertFalse(decompilerPORTGVolatile);
setUp(true, 4, null, false);
//Decompiler should indicate mem:0x31 and mem:0x34 are volatile
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTFVolatile);
Assert.assertTrue(decompilerPORTGVolatile);
}
}