The intro predated the 2026-10-02 audit and did not mention the newly added flask-restx and flask-smorest.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The intro predated the 2026-10-02 audit and did not mention the newly added prophet, statsforecast, and sktime.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The intro predated the 2026-10-02 audit and still recommended Keras as a main pick after its demotion to Second Tier.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Mock entry was named `mock`, the PyPI backport package, while it links to and describes the standard-library `unittest.mock` module.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended SET (social-engineer-toolkit), which the 2026-10-02 audit removed from the README section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended Gooey and Tkinter Designer, which the 2026-10-02 audit removed; removing Gooey also dissolved the Wrappers subcategory.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended freezegun, which the 2026-10-02 audit replaced with time-machine in the README section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended MonkeyType and repowise, which the 2026-10-02 audit removed from the README section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 2026-10-02 audit changed the Jupyter entry from the jupyter metapackage to notebook, which the old intro predated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended PyGraphviz, which the 2026-10-02 audit replaced with graphviz, and missed Dash, which the audit added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The old intro recommended Kitten TTS and VibeVoice, which the 2026-10-02 audit removed from the README section.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
graphify's PyPI override was null (GitHub-only), so the site showed no download count although the project now publishes on PyPI as graphifyy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
jev-ultrafast is not published on PyPI but had no null override, so every download sweep queried PyPI for it and recorded NOT_FOUND.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The download sweep queried PyPI by display name, but PyPI conda is a stale 2017 upload and PyPI pyodide is a 0.0.2 placeholder, so the site showed unrelated packages' download counts for both entries.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Removed: tkdesigner (317 downloads/month, ClickPy 2026-10-01): its only PyPI release, 1.0.7 (2023-01-22), pins Pillow<9, requests==2.25.1 and urllib3<2, so it has no installable wheels on Python 3.11+, which reverses the August keep. gooey (6,049/month): no release since 1.0.8.1 on 2021-06-12. Dropping gooey empties Wrappers, so the subcategory is dissolved and its URL redirects to /categories/gui-development/. Also: Desktop re-tier, dearpygui up to obvious choice (the only Desktop entry that grew since August) and wxPython down to Second Tier (about half its August downloads).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Removed: repowise (14,584 downloads/month, pypistats 2026-10-02): no adoption trajectory (about 33K in August to 19.5K on ClickPy), and it left Code Analysis with three challengers against a limit of two. monkeytype (529,705/month): fails the 12-month activity line (default branch last commit 2025-06-14, last release 2023-03-20). Dropping monkeytype empties Type Annotations Generators, so the subcategory is dissolved and its URL redirects to /categories/code-analysis/.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This lead followed the same appositive frame as the other category intro leads ("X, a/the Python Y library ..."), so it read as one template with the category swapped in; it now has its own sentence frame, keeping the same picks and facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The rembg paragraph linked the same GitHub URL twice; the model-license link now points at the README's models section, where that claim is stated.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The intro named Ultralytics' license with its version, AGPL-3.0, against the rule that intros name a license by family only.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Vinta ChenandClaude