From 68b15a4644eefab12c849c3cf5b9c05e976b482e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vinta Chen Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:13:43 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] docs: rephrase obvious-choice criterion in PR template Reuses CONTRIBUTING.md's plainer 'would name when asked' phrasing instead of 'unprompted', per maintainer feedback that 'unprompted' didn't sound right. Co-Authored-By: Claude --- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md index 865e26ad..41890f46 100644 --- a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md +++ b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Pick one: -- [ ] **Obvious choice** - a tool an experienced Python developer would name unprompted for this use case +- [ ] **Obvious choice** - a tool an experienced Python developer would name when asked "what do I use for this?" - [ ] **Challenger** - not yet the obvious choice, but a credible successor to one. Give adoption-trajectory evidence, not popularity alone. Explain: